The Hoax is Unraveling Before Their Eyes
While the Flu almost completely disappeared in the last year and a half, deaths from another so-called disease skyrocketed. Even while thousands of scientists and physicians have verified that the "virus" was similar to other viruses with the same name, mainstream media hype, along with lies from people like Fauci and Chinese Disease Control organization and others WHO progressed a narrative, have convinced us that hundreds of thousands have died from the disease. How strange that it is now verified that many of the tests used to confirm infection were highly ineffective and faulty. These tests are even considered dangerous. ("The FDA has identified this as a Class I recall, the most serious type of recall. Use of these devices may cause serious injuries or death.")
Why are we not surprised?
- Innova SARS-CoV-2 Antigen Rapid Qualitative Test (also distributed under the names Innova COVID-19 Self-Test Kit (3T Configuration), Innova SARS-CoV-2-Antigen Rapid Qualitative Test (7T Configuration), and Innova SARS-CoV-2-Antigen Rapid Qualitative Test (25T Configuration))
- Lot codes:
- 25T (25 tests per box) - U2101750, U2101751, X2006004, X2008001, X2008010, X2009002, X2009004, X2009013, X2009016, X2010004, X2010010, X2011005, X2011006, X2011007, X2011008, X2011009, X2011012, X2011013, X2011015, X2011016, X2011017, X2011025, X2011051, X2011052, X2012001, X2012002, X2012004, X2012005, X2012008, X2101002, X2101004, X2101014, X2101031, X2101038
- 3T (3 tests per box) - U2102003, X2012310
- 7T (7 tests per box) - U2101748, U2102001, U2102002, X2012711, X2103792
Distribution Dates: November 2, 2020 to March 22, 2021
Devices Recalled in the U.S.: At least 77,339
Date Initiated by Firm: March 24, 2021
- Lot codes:
The Innova SARS-CoV-2 Antigen Rapid Qualitative Test claimed to determine if a person has an active COVID-19 infection. The test used a nasal swab sample and test strip to detect specific proteins, called antigens, from the SARS-CoV-2 virus. If the nasal sample had SARS-CoV-2 antigens, a colored test line should have appeared on the test strip, indicating that the person may have COVID-19. If the nasal sample did not have SARS-CoV-2 antigens, a colored line should not have appeared on the test strip. The test has not been authorized, cleared, or approved by FDA for commercial distribution in the United States.Reason for Recall
Innova Medical Group is recalling its SARS-CoV-2 Antigen Rapid Qualitative Test. Labeling distributed with certain configurations of the test includes performance claims that did not accurately reflect the performance estimates observed during the clinical studies of the tests. The performance characteristics of the test have not been adequately established, presenting a risk of false results.
- False-negative results may lead to delayed diagnosis or inappropriate treatment of SARS-CoV-2, which may cause patient harm, including serious illness and death. False-negative results can also lead to further spread of the SARS-CoV-2 virus, including when presumed negative patients are grouped into cohorts in health care, long-term care, and other facilities based on false test results.
- False-positive results could lead to a delay in the correct diagnosis and the initiation of appropriate treatment for the actual cause of patient illness, which could be another life-threatening disease that is not SARS-CoV-2. False-positive results could also lead to further spread of the SARS-CoV-2 virus when presumed positive patients are grouped into cohorts based on false test results.
The unraveling hoax is most certainly why Fraudci is now recommending new masking guidelines to the CDC, which I have dubbed the Chinese Disease Control organization. The tests were only authorized under the EUA or emergency use authorization, the same as the jabs. Meanwhile, reports to VAERS or the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System have confirmed more deaths from the jabs than all other vaccines combined over the last 30 years. Unfortunately, common sense is lost among the "follow the science" crowd. Though following the science is the last thing they actually do since there is no science behind it, only a media-hyped narrative.
Given the facts, do we continue to trust their guidance and recommendations for new tests and guidelines? Will other emergency use COVID tests be similarly canceled by FDA and CDC? Why isn't this a mainstream media headline since these tests have guided policy not only in America but around the world? These guidelines have decided everything from stay-at-home orders to school and business closures, masking, and distancing requirements.
There have been other flawed tests as well. For example, take a look at this report from none other than NPR.
"On Feb. 6, a scientist in a small infectious disease lab on the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention campus in Atlanta was putting a coronavirus test kit through its final paces. The lab designed and built the diagnostic test in record time, and the little vials that contained necessary reagents to identify the virus were boxed up and ready to go. But NPR has learned the results of that final quality control test suggested something troubling — it said the kit could fail 33% of the time.
"Under normal circumstances, that kind of result would stop a test in its tracks, half a dozen public and private lab officials told NPR. But an internal CDC review obtained by NPR confirms that lab officials decided to release the kit anyway. The revelation comes from a CDC internal review, known as a "root-cause analysis," which the agency conducted to understand why an early coronavirus test didn't work properly and wound up costing scientists precious weeks in the early days of a pandemic."
PCR tests are also unreliable as tests for the virus. Kary Mullis, the inventor of the PCR test, had this to say:
The other major problem with the PCR tests is that they do not differentiate between COVID and influenza. Ah, here is the rub which highlights the point of this article. From the CDC website:
"CDC encourages laboratories to consider adoption of a multiplexed method that can facilitate detection and differentiation of SARS-CoV-2 and influenza viruses."
How many doctors and scientists have been saying this all along? Perhaps the PCR tests served their purpose so they can be safely shelved.
It's kind of complicated because the phreak club Fraudchi belongs to basically failed with their bioweapon. In other words, the "official" death statistics reported to us are bunk. They stacked the numbers to scare us - a lot. These control freaks were rushed into this bio attack on America (and the rest of the world as collateral damage) by the aggressive stable genius moves of Trump and his team and allies - and of course, all the prayer warriors! Hence, their "gain-of-function" virus ended up being pretty harmless relative to the massive death they really sought.
We all need, to get the Word out. Mother Earth herself, is dying for us to speak in her behalf with a grain or two of common sense.
You won't know what you can accomplish, until you give it a good try taking it to the next level. We are here to support you overcoming the technical hurdles to sharing you thoughts, wisdom, art, vision, with the world via the internet, the most powerful communication medium in human history.
The best way to get started, is to load your MyRR Arsenal with ammunition, posting content here exactly like you would on FB and Twitt. When you are ready to jump into Citizen Journalism, publishing your articles, research, art etc as articles and features in Top Stories and other RRM Categories, it's time to join the Creators Guild becoming an RRM Author and Editor!
One of our authors has an RRM article that popped past 80k hits, while we were still testing the site. Seeing your FB or Twitt posts languishing as usual at one or two dozen engagements, watching the same posts on RRM pulling thousands of hits, you'll get quite clearly why we built this.
If you haven't already begun your RRM adventure:
This commment is unpublished.· 1 months agoBreathtaking SNARK in this Truth Telling article!! Sure to remain a classic read among historians in the near future when they try to unravel HOW THE HELL DID EVERYTHING GO SO WRONG? BRAVO!