What happens when sacrificing the individual for the benefit of the collective becomes the standard for a society? We have many examples from the past, even from the recent past; from less than one hundred years ago, we have seen what happens when people believe that their actions are for the greater good of the whole and that others should sacrifice their lives for this reason.

CARING CORRUPTED - The Killing Nurses of The Third Reich 

UTHealth Nursing on YouTube
Published Feb 2, 2017
56:07 viewing length

I wonder how much of our modern medicine results from the inhumane experiments on Jews and others? How many of the war criminals escaped justice so that they could work in secret weapons programs in the United States and other secret programs such as so-called healthcare? 

The Bayer pharmaceutical company, which now also owns Monsanto, partially funded the experiments on people in the concentration camps? It behooves us to understand that CEOs and others inside pharmaceutical companies have no moral compass. Clearly, the only thing they care about is profit. Unfortunately, individuals work within organizations that believe they are working for the common good. Some individuals seek to convince us, as a society, that we must sacrifice our individual rights for the common good of the collective. How many of our individual rights should we sacrifice? Should what we are allowed or even encouraged to do, even if morally questionable, be done for the "good of society"? Can we ask others to give up their inalienable rights to protect the collective? And does this actually save the collective?

A more important question is; what keeps people from doing these things? If a person does not have any morality, how can they judge what is wrong or right? (to paraphrase what one of the nurses said) If what you do or support harms another life, is it morally right to do it or support it? Is it ethically correct to sacrifice one life for the so-called betterment of another? Is it morally correct to euthanize anyone whether they agree to it or not? That is a slippery slope that is certainly proving itself to be so. 

There is now a suicide pod in Switzerland that someone can get into and push a button to die. In Canada and other countries, assisted suicide is the norm, and in some cases, the individual does not have to have any physical disease or condition which is considered terminal. 

In the United States, in some states and elsewhere, abortion of babies is allowed through all nine months of pregnancy for any reason. Babies are killed in the womb because of birth defects, even Down's Syndrome. Some celebrate this idea that we have so fewer children born with Down's Syndrome, yet children who were mentally disabled or "unfit" were the very ones killed by the Third Reich and their killing nurses. The right to kill our children in the womb is celebrated by Planned Parenthood and others, citing the child would not have a good life, that the parents can't afford them, or even that they're inconvenient. These were the same reasons given to parents in Germany to surrender their children and to the nurses for ending their lives. 

Progressives like to say that pregnancy is always a risk, and a woman should not have to carry a child if she doesn't want to. Where does that slippery slope end? In California, a new law is being ushered through the legislature to be signed by the governor which allows babies to die after birth for up to 30 days with no accountability by the mother or anyone else to report the reason for the death of the child, thus holding harmless and questionless those who chose to kill their babies after birth.

It is clear that it is only belief in a Supreme Being, God, the Creator, that keeps us morally anchored so that we do not commit heinous crimes against others. Moreover, it is our oneness with each other, our belief that we are all part of the same loving Being that keeps us from harming other people or justifying harm to others. Jesus taught us that what we do to one, we do to Him. What we do to each other, we do to ourselves. The two most important commandments from the Bible are to "have no other gods before Me," and the other is to "love thy neighbor as thyself."

When people start to believe that they are superior to others and become gods unto themselves, atrocities inevitably follow. Hedonism and immorality lead to complete corruption in society, not the other way around. Hedonism does not lead to a better society. Any society that has allowed itself to slip into complete debauchery has fallen. The United States of America was founded upon moral principles, and without those principles, we will not survive. Our moral principles are based upon the belief in a Creator. All of the Founders of our country believed in God. They did not create a state religion, as was the case in Europe. They believed each person has the right to worship God or not by their own conscience. But we must remember that we are a God Loving nation and that God is very much a part of who we are and who we have been. We will not survive otherwise.


Modern Progressivism traces it roots back to the late 19th and into the early 20th century in what purports to be motivated by the need for social and economic reform. While many may believe this movement was begun in order to help the less fortunate, the poor, the underprivileged, as well as those of other races including Native Americans, a closer examination of these roots uncovers the truth; that this movement was actually begun and continued in order to prop up those who considered themselves better than the aforementioned groups of people. In other words, it was a movement of snobs against slobs.


MyRR Arsenal: A mighty tide has begun, people are coming to RRM for many reasons, including a censorship-free safe haven for their content--and best of all, it's free!
Click on the above photo to go to the linktree