The Lies of Revisionist History, In Defense of Christopher Columbus


This year on Columbus Day, I was aware, as many were, of vulgar memes on social media platforms, symbolizing the inaccuracies and downright lies of the revisionist historians concerning Christopher Columbus.

The left has increasingly characterized Christopher Columbus as a genocidal maniac in an attempt, in my view, to also portray the "white man" as the enemy of all native peoples. This attempt is nothing more than a concerted effort to make Americans hate their country by making them hate the very foundations of our civilization.

Indeed, there were atrocities committed against native people by some white men, and we make no excuses for them. But we must examine our history honestly if we are to move forward in any meaningful way.

Let's begin with Howard Zinn, the infamous author. He has somehow made the garbage he calls history, which he spews in this book, A People's History of the United States, into the American school system over the past several decades. Not only does Howard Zinn attempt, with some success, to make Americans hate their country, but he does so by plagiarizing another author who also bases his theories on complete lies and fallacies.

Howard Zinn has his detractors from both the left and the right. For example, Arthur Schlesinger called Zinn "a polemicist, not a historian."1 Cornell history professor Michael Kammen, in his review in the Washington Post, called Zinn's writing "a scissor and paste pot job" with too much attention on "historians, historiography and historical polemic" which left "precious little space for the substance of history." Kammen called Zinn a "radical academic and social activist."2

Much of Zinn's writing is nothing more than a rewrite and plagiarism of his Dutch friend and fellow socialist Hans Koning, though Koning didn't seem to mind that his friend stole his work. I suppose being friends and having the same political goals worked for them. Both Koning and Zinn intentionally left out passages from Columbus' logs and distorted his words and meanings by doing so. For example, Zinn writes:

"Arawak men and women, naked, tawny, and full of wonder, emerged from their villages onto the island's beaches and swam out to get a closer look at the strange big boat. When Columbus and his sailors came ashore, carrying swords, speaking oddly, the Arawaks ran to greet them, brought them food, water, gifts. He later wrote of this in his log: 'They . . . brought us parrots and balls of cotton, and spears and many other things, which they exchanged for the glass beads and hawks' bells. They willingly traded everything they owned. . . . '"

He leaves out notable passages that clear up the meanings of his writings. For example, Zinn leaves out, as does his friend Koning this passage from Columbus log:

"I saw some who bore marks of wounds on their bodies, and I made signs to them to ask how this came about, and they indicated to me that people came from other islands, which are near, and wished to capture them, and they defended themselves. And I believed and still believe that they come here from the mainland to take them for slaves."

Zinn and Koning actually put together different passages from other paragraphs to make the meaning seem to be what they wanted it to be.

Also left out was a passage in Columbus log on October 12, 1492, where he wrote:

"I warned my men to take nothing from the people without giving them something in exchange."3

Clearly, these are not the words of a genocidal maniac, but instead of someone of high morality and character, who wished no harm to the people he encountered in the Americas.

Who Was Christopher Columbus and Why Does He Deserve a Holiday?

Dinesh D'Souza on Rumble
Published Oct. 11, 2021
Viewing Length 7:55

Rob Petrone makes the case for honoring Christopher Columbus

RealAmerica'sVoice on Rumble
Published Oct. 12, 2021
Viewing Length 3:51


Modern Progressivism traces it roots back to the late 19th and into the early 20th century in what purports to be motivated by the need for social and economic reform. While many may believe this movement was begun in order to help the less fortunate, the poor, the underprivileged, as well as those of other races including Native Americans, a closer examination of these roots uncovers the truth; that this movement was actually begun and continued in order to prop up those who considered themselves better than the aforementioned groups of people. In other words, it was a movement of snobs against slobs.


In addition to enjoying some of the best news and commentary on the internet, membership in our patriot community is growing rapidly. Free Membership gives you access to your MyRR Timeline, Pages and Groups. Simply posting content here exactly like you would on FB and Twitt, secures it from censorship.

As you establish your presence, you'll start noticing your RRM content is drawing many times more hits than you are seeing on deepstate-controlled social media. We designed RRM to be your most potent tool for reaching out and touching the world.

One of our authors has an RRM article that popped past 80k hits, while we were still testing the site. Seeing your FB or Twitt posts languishing as usual at one or two dozen engagements, watching the same posts on RRM pulling thousands of hits, you'll get quite clearly why we built this.

Your MyRR Profile and Timeline, Pages and Groups are your Arsenal, where you store the ammo securely, out of reach of the rampant censorship war being waged against the people and against decency and truth.

People in conversation:
Loading comment... The comment will be refreshed after 00:00.
  • This commment is unpublished.
    Franz · 1 months ago
    The deep dive on why mockingbird society reviles Columbus is a study of evil itself - the lying, murdering devil himself.
    • This commment is unpublished.
      Franz · 1 months ago
      Imagine that America's schools promote this filth, from Kindergarten to PhD level.
You must login to post a comment.

By accepting you will be accessing a service provided by a third-party external to